Working out is a great way to stay healthy, so why shouldn't we get coverage for our fitness memberships? More active people = less sick people.Should the new health care laws cover fitness memberships?I refuse to pay for your gym membership. Our taxes already pay for public parks you can go run and exercise in.Should the new health care laws cover fitness memberships?
no but Anarchy needs to start to happen soon! or we're all f*ckedShould the new health care laws cover fitness memberships?In Germany health insurance covers doctor prescribed stays in spas.Should the new health care laws cover fitness memberships?
No. You can't do push ups and sit ups at home? If you are getting started, a pair of dumbells = or %26lt; 20# is all you need.
I agree that exercise is great, but I have bothered to purchase enough equipment (bench, mats, free weights, bike, step machine) over a period time to have no need to go to a gym.
Going to a gym can be too social for some folks to stay focused. If you need that support, pay for it yourself. If I am paying for your gym membership and you aren't going, I want my money back. I expect you to go at least an average of twice per week for at least 20 minutes. How many people do you know who would/could honor this.Should the new health care laws cover fitness memberships?The only NEW laws we need are REPEALS of old ones. MOST of the cost of health care results from COMPLYING with existing laws.
Health club membership DOES NOT = more active people. I had such a membership for 2 years and actually entered the club less than 5 times. The clubs actually COUNT on that type of 'client'.Should the new health care laws cover fitness memberships?
The government already provides free exercise equipment. 'It's called 'roads' or 'sidewalks' or 'parks.'
You can be fit and healthy without exercise equipment. People did it for hundreds of years.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment